The World (worst!)Health Organisation (WHO) is a United Nations agency that claims to connects nations, partners and people to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable – so everyone, everywhere can attain the highest level of health.
The WHO is seeking to get all 194 member countries to sign a new Global Pandemic Accord in May to ensure there is a united response if and when another pandemic emerges. The 194 countries who are members of the World Health Organisation decided in December 2021 to work towards an Accord to work together to prepare for and stem any new pandemic threat, including by achieving equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. Many believe the WHO will take away national sovereignty and that it wants the power to forcibly vaccinate people, have surveillance of people’s movements through digital passports and will have the ability to deploy a global police force of armed troops to enforce mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns.
History of the WHO
“When diplomats met to form the United Nations in 1945, one of the things they discussed was setting up a global health organization. WHO’s Constitution came into force on 7 April 1948 – a date we now celebrate every year as World Health Day.
In April 1945, during the Conference to set up the United Nations (UN) held in San Francisco, representatives of Brazil and China proposed that an international health organization be established and a conference to frame its constitution convened. On 15 February 1946, the Economic and Social Council of the UN instructed the Secretary-General to convoke such a conference. A Technical Preparatory Committee met in Paris from 18 March to 5 April 1946 and drew up proposals for the Constitution which were presented to the International Health Conference in New York City between 19 June and 22 July 1946. On the basis of these proposals, the Conference drafted and adopted the Constitution of the World Health Organization, signed 22 July 1946 by representatives of 51 Members of the UN and of 10 other nations.
The Conference established also an Interim Commission to carry out certain activities of the existing health institutions until the entry into force of the Constitution of the World Health Organization. The preamble and Article 69 of the Constitution of WHO provide that WHO should be a specialized agency of the UN. Article 80 provides that the Constitution would come into force when 26 members of the United Nations had ratified it. The Constitution did not come into force until 7 April 1948, when the 26th of the 61 governments who had signed it ratified its signature. The first Health Assembly opened in Geneva on 24 June 1948 with delegations from 53 of the 55 Member States. It decided that the Interim Commission was to cease to exist at midnight on 31 August 1948, to be immediately succeeded by WHO.” https://www.who.int/about/history/
THE WHO Today
The WHO is funded by member states yet the biggest contributor is the Gates Foundation who in 2023 provided 88% of donations, “by any definition, that’s a controlling interest.” (Dr David Martin). Other donators are the Wellcome Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation.
The director general of the World Health Organization since 2017 is Tedros Gebreyesus from Ethiopia. He is not a medical doctor and many say he is just a puppet controlled by the Cabal. He is also a member of the “Tigray People’s Liberation Front”, which was classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government in the 1990s and is still listed on the Global Terrorism Database.
“It’s not just humans, the WHO wants dominion over all plants, animals and humans and a big part of this is repeated mass vaccination over and over again ” (Dr Peter McCullough.)
Do you want the WHO to be in charge of your health?
WHO Pandemic Treaty Threat Looms Larger
An updated version of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty reveals an extensive power grab under the banner of a ‘One Health’ approach, now adding climate change, energy, and sustainability to the agenda the unelected global agency has its sights on.
WHO Whistleblower Connects The Dots
Former ethics researcher at the WHO, Astrid Stuckelburger, PhD, sheds light on the behind-the-scenes at our top world health agency, their conflicts of interests, and who’s really been pulling the strings in the #Covid19 pandemic response.
Exposed: WHO Now Wants Power Over US Citizens
Right now, the World Health Organization (WHO) is in the process of finalizing a new global treaty, which would give it great authority to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic.
And so, while the WHO has been, up until now, an advisory body somewhere in Europe that U.S. officials in the CDC and the FDA can turn to for advice—they will instead become the ones to actually determine which policies we implement, like our vaccine policies, our lockdown policies, our school closure policies, the contact tracing of our citizens, and even the monitoring of our online speech if that speech goes against the official narrative.
And so, in this episode, we discuss the origins of the WHO, as well as the implications of this new treaty. Watch…
The WHO Overplays its Hand and Watches Support Drain Away
Cracks are forming in the World Health Organisation’s plans to secure a vast expansion of its powers and resources. Presented as a necessarily urgent response to the empirically unsupported assertion that pandemics are increasing in frequency and severity, negotiations for a broad package of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and a new parallel Pandemic Treaty had been expected to be over by the end of 2023. Having missed that deadline, in late January the Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus pleaded for WHO member states to give ground so that the negotiations could be completed at all. In the same comments he sought to apportion blame for the unexpected headwinds on those who had misconstrued, or misrepresented, the benign intentions of the WHO and its key supporters (which include China and some wealthy private organisations). Read more
World Health Organisation Head: Global Compliance Needed For Next Pandemic
In an appearance at the globalist World Economic Forum in Davos, the Director General of the World Health Organisation urged that global cooperation will be needed during the next pandemic, and that “national interests” hinder compliance.
In a session titled “Disease X,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stated that in order to be “better prepared” and “to understand disease X,” the WHO’s ‘Pandemic Agreement’ needs to be adopted globally.
“This is about a common enemy,” Tedros continued, adding “without a shared response, we will face the same problem as COVID.”
He explained that the decline for the legislation is May of this year and member states are negotiating between countries to implement it.
“This is a common global interest, and very narrow national interests should not come in the way,” he continued, adding “of course national interests are natural, but they could be difficult and affect the negotiations.” Read more…
Croatian MEP, Mislav Kolakušić: “[The WHO] should be declared a terrorist organisation… [It] is more dangerous for humanity than the WEF.”
“It would be healthier and safer for humanity to sign an agreement with the Colombian drug cartel [than to sign an agreement with the World Health Organisation].”
Slovakia will not be entering into any international pandemic agreements with WHO, Prime Minister says
During a SMER party conference, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico declared that his government will not sign the World Health Organisation’s Pandemic Treaty and SMER Members of Parliament will not ratify in parliament the Pandemic Treaty with the WHO because it is a project of greedy pharmaceutical companies. Read more…
Senator Ron Johnson blows the lid off the Globalist’s attempting a takeover using organisations like the World Health Organization, and why we must fight back.
United Kingdom Parliment Response to a Petition Signed by over 100,000 people to End Membership of WHO
The UK Government will not end our WHO membership. We are committed to working with the WHO to tackle the world’s health issues. We do not and will never cede sovereign powers through our partnership.
The UK continues to have a strong relationship with the World Health Organization (WHO), which, as the United Nation’s specialised agency for health, and the world’s main technical and co-ordinating body in global health, has a vital role to play in supporting public health globally. The Government will not end the UK’s WHO membership.
The WHO is a Member State-led organisation and works on a wide range of technical health areas. These areas are agreed with Member States, including the UK, in advance and are based on our collective health needs and priorities; they are outlined in the WHO’s General Programme of Work (GPW) which are adopted and reviewed regularly by Member States. The current GPW runs from 2019 to 2024; the UK, amongst other Member States, is engaged in the development of the next GPW which will run from 2025 to 2029.
The WHO is the cornerstone of global health cooperation. It is through the WHO that Member States share with each other information on disease outbreaks around the world, share best practice on how to counter health threats and emergencies, and make commitments to each other to undertake activities to promote health and to avoid activities which could be detrimental to health.
The UK has long partnered with the WHO and its Member States to tackle the world’s most pressing health challenges. The UK continues to engage with the WHO, including on improving the global health system so the world better prepares and responds to future health emergencies. The UK is also an active attendee at the WHO governing body meetings including the WHO World Health Assembly and the WHO Executive Board. The World Health Assembly (WHA) is the decision-making body of the WHO; it is attended by delegations from all WHO Member States and focuses on a specific health agenda prepared by Member States on the Executive Board. The UK is a rotating member of the WHO Executive Board including most recently until May 2023, and we use these opportunities to hold WHO to account for delivering the General Programme of Work and other commitments.
The Government wants to best protect the UK population including from future pandemics. COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats.
The best way to protect the UK from the next pandemic is by ensuring all Member States can contain and respond to disease outbreaks through compliance with International Health Regulations (IHR). Therefore, the Government is supporting the processes of negotiating an Accord on pandemic preparedness and response, and agreeing targeted amendments of the IHR as a means of strengthening preparedness for and in response to future health emergencies.
The Pandemic Accord is intended to prevent and tackle pandemic threats, whereas the IHR is a technical framework, the purpose and scope of which is to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease. Both processes aim to strengthen global health coordination, cooperation and mutual accountability to address the weaknesses seen in global health security during the COVID-19 pandemic and other recent health emergencies.
Both negotiations processes are led by Member States.
W.H.O. Head Ignores Experts On Monkeypox
Ignoring his expert panel at the WHO, Director General Tedros has declared monkeypox an international public health emergency. With the U.S. investing over $1B over two decades in a vaccine for this very moment, will it be effective?
WHO staff rape children and UN “peacekeepers” kill and injure civilians, yet they demand more control over our lives
Not only is the World Health Organisation’s Director-General a terrorist, but WHO has rapists and terrorists on its staff.
WHO is an agency of the United Nations (“UN”). There are sex scandals involving the UN as well. There have been UN sex trafficking scandals reported in Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as a notoriously ignominious child sex ring organised in Haiti.
The UN’s violence against civilians doesn’t end with rape and sex crimes. UN “peacekeepers” have indiscriminately killed and injured civilians in Somalia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
It’s not just atrocities committed by individual UN employees against those unfortunate enough to live in areas where the UN takes control we must beware of – every citizen’s freedoms are endangered by the UN’s policies. Read more…
WHO implements large-scale Ivermectin-based MDA for one million Rohingya refugees
Remember when Ivermectin was called a horse paste and they said humans shouldn’t even take it? Now the World Health Organisation is handing it out to a million humans.
The World Health Organization (WHO) Bangladesh is carrying out a large-scale Mass Drug Administration (MDA) campaign in partnership with the Government of Bangladesh and Health Sector partners to break the transmission of persistent scabies upsurge among Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar and Bhasan Char. Read more…
